[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130319141017.GB24900@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:10:17 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] n_tty: Encapsulate minimum_to_wake within N_TTY
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:57:09AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:15 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:38:22AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > > minimum_to_wake is unique to N_TTY processing, and belongs in
> > > per-ldisc data.
> > >
> > > Add the ldisc method, ldisc_ops::fasync(), to notify line disciplines
> > > when signal-driven I/O is enabled or disabled. When enabled for N_TTY
> > > (by fcntl(F_SETFL, O_ASYNC)), blocking reader/polls will be woken
> > > for any readable input. When disabled, blocking reader/polls are not
> > > woken until the read buffer is full.
> > >
> > > Canonical mode (L_ICANON(tty), n_tty_data::icanon) is not affected by
> > > the minimum_to_wake setting.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
> >
> > For some reason, this patch doesn't apply. Care to refresh this one,
> > and the rest in this series, and resend?
>
> Sorry. There was probably some accidental dependency on one of the other
> patchsets of mine you did apply.
>
> This and patch 5 now apply without error to tty-next.
Ok, but they are now long gone from my queue. Can you please resend
what I haven't applied?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists