[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32387.1363705826@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:10:26 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel threads
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Why? If we remove the tracepoint from the slowpath and use a table swap,
> then we wouldn't need to use the slowpath at all.
How are you engineering a table swap? Do you patch the system call code to
change the immediate address loaded or do you put in a level of indirection?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists