linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/75] 3.8.4-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKocOONjfrrezhzG7du6KtwayxidbHwJjSoppXML4_zfGNYAkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:51:50 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 00/75] 3.8.4-stable review

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:00:32PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:09:11PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> >> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:37PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> >> >> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.8.4 release.
>> >> >> > There are 75 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> >> >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> >> >> > let me know.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Responses should be made by Wed Mar 20 21:04:55 UTC 2013.
>> >> >> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> >> >> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.8.4-rc1.gz
>> >> >> > and the diffstat can be found below.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > thanks,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > greg k-h
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is the warn from 3.8.4-rc1
>> >> >> [  700.009112] Component: resume devices, time: 10004
>> >> >> [  700.009204] Modules linked in: ip6table_filter ip6_tables
>> >> >> ebtable_nat ebtables nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state
>> >> >> nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp
>> >> >> iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables bridge stp llc bnep rfcomm bluetooth
>> >> >> arc4 iwldvm snd_hda_codec_analog radeon snd_hda_intel mac80211
>> >> >> coretemp snd_hda_codec kvm_intel kvm snd_hwdep binfmt_misc snd_pcm
>> >> >> snd_seq_midi iwlwifi snd_rawmidi ttm snd_seq_midi_event cfg80211
>> >> >> drm_kms_helper pata_pcmcia snd_seq tpm_infineon drm psmouse snd_timer
>> >> >> joydev pcmcia snd_seq_device snd yenta_socket tpm_tis microcode
>> >> >> pcmcia_rsrc pcmcia_core ppdev dm_multipath i2c_algo_bit video hp_wmi
>> >> >> mac_hid sparse_keymap serio_raw soundcore snd_page_alloc lpc_ich wmi
>> >> >> hp_accel lis3lv02d input_polldev parport_pc lp parport firewire_ohci
>> >> >> sdhci_pci sdhci firewire_core crc_itu_t e1000e
>> >> >> [  700.009212] Pid: 2637, comm: bash Not tainted 3.8.4-rc1+ #8
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you get this same warning on 3.9-rc3?
>> >> >
>> >> > I thought I got all of the needed fixes for this warning, what am I
>> >> > missing here?
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > greg k-h
>> >>
>> >> I think this is a new one. You did pull in the two patches you needed.
>> >> I am getting ready to test it in 3.9.0-rc1. Will let you know in a
>> >> bit. I have to do a git pull for the latest and do a compile.
>> >
>> > Please try 3.9-rc3, -rc1 didn't have the original patch that caused the
>> > warning to show up in it.
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>> Seeing the same on 3.9-rc3. I reverted the three commits and re-ran
>> the test, still see the same warnings. From what I can tell, this
>> warning on my test system has nothing to do with these commits.
>>
>> 6c4d3bc99b3341067775efd4d9d13cc8e655fd7c
>> 2a6e06b2aed6995af401dcd4feb5e79a0c7ea554
>> 1d9d8639c063caf6efc2447f5f26aa637f844ff6
>
> Good to know, thanks for testing.
>
>> With this warning resolved to be an existing condition on my test
>> system, 3.0.70-rc1, 3.4.37-rc1, and 3.8.4-rc1 booted on both my test
>> systems and cross-compile tests passed. dmesgs look good and no
>> regressions from the previous round.
>>
>> Please let me know if I should do the revert test on 3.0.70-rc1,
>> 3.4.37-rc1, and 3.8.4-rc1. I can get to that tomorrow.
>
> Does 3.8.3 show the same warning?  That would be the easiest thing to
> test.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Easier than I thought it would be. I thought I removed the older
releases and turns out still have them installed. 3.8.3, 3.4.36, and
3.0.69 show the the same warning after resume on my system.

-- Shuah
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/