[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130319123531.9777a366ff0e1611727405cd@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:35:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: vgoyal@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cpw@....com,
kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@...com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/21] vmcore, procfs: introduce a flag to
distinguish objects copied in 2nd kernel
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:01:26 +0900 HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> The part of dump target memory is copied into the 2nd kernel if it
> doesn't satisfy mmap()'s page-size boundary requirement. To
> distinguish such copied object from usual old memory, a flag
> MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL is introduced. If this flag is set, the object
> is considered being copied into buffer on the 2nd kernel.
>
I don't understand this description at all :( Perhaps we can have a
lengthier version which expands on the concepts a bit further?
> --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> @@ -97,11 +97,17 @@ struct kcore_list {
> int type;
> };
>
> +#define MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL 0x1
A comment describing this would be useful.
> struct vmcore {
> struct list_head list;
> - unsigned long long paddr;
> + union {
> + unsigned long long paddr;
> + char *buf;
> + };
This change wasn't described in the changelog?
> unsigned long long size;
> loff_t offset;
> + unsigned int flag;
Presumably this is the place where we put MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL?
That's unobvious from reading the code. Add the text "vmcore.flag
fields:" above the MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL definition.
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists