lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:35:31 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	vgoyal@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cpw@....com,
	kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@...com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/21] vmcore, procfs: introduce a flag to
 distinguish objects copied in 2nd kernel

On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:01:26 +0900 HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> The part of dump target memory is copied into the 2nd kernel if it
> doesn't satisfy mmap()'s page-size boundary requirement. To
> distinguish such copied object from usual old memory, a flag
> MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL is introduced. If this flag is set, the object
> is considered being copied into buffer on the 2nd kernel.
> 

I don't understand this description at all :( Perhaps we can have a
lengthier version which expands on the concepts a bit further?

> --- a/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/proc_fs.h
> @@ -97,11 +97,17 @@ struct kcore_list {
>  	int type;
>  };
>  
> +#define MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL 0x1

A comment describing this would be useful.

>  struct vmcore {
>  	struct list_head list;
> -	unsigned long long paddr;
> +	union {
> +		unsigned long long paddr;
> +		char *buf;
> +	};

This change wasn't described in the changelog?

>  	unsigned long long size;
>  	loff_t offset;
> +	unsigned int flag;

Presumably this is the place where we put MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL? 
That's unobvious from reading the code.  Add the text "vmcore.flag
fields:" above the MEM_TYPE_CURRENT_KERNEL definition.


>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ