[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130319204804.GJ3042@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:48:04 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST v3.9-rc1] sched: replace PF_THREAD_BOUND with
PF_NO_SETAFFINITY
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:47:15AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:41:40AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > This patch replaces PF_THREAD_BOUND with PF_NO_SETAFFINITY.
> > > sched_setaffinity() checks the flag and return -EINVAL if set.
> > > set_cpus_allowed_ptr() is no longer affected by the flag.
> > >
> > > This will allow simplifying workqueue worker CPU affinity management.
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> >
> > I suspect you want to carry this in the workqueue tree, to enable those
> > extra simplifications?
>
> Yeah, I was planning to pull from one of the -tip branches but if I
> can carry it through the workqueue tree it would be simpler. Would
> that be okay?
Applying to wq/for-3.10 w/ the rebinding cleanup. Holler if this
should be routed differently.
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists