lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5148DBFE.3040402@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:43:26 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: add table lookup to mux

On 03/19/2013 03:37 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-03-12 11:53:46)
>> On 03/12/2013 12:42 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
>>> Add a table lookup feature to the mux clock. Also allow arbitrary masks
>>> instead of the width. This will be used by some clocks on Tegra114. Also
>>> adapt the tegra periph clk because it uses struct clk_mux directly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> This is the same patch I posted before which implements a table lookup
>>> feature for the mux clock. I squashed both the changes to clk-mux.c and
>>> tegra/clk.h together in order to make the patch bisectable.
>>
>> For the record in this thread, this is a dependency of the Tegra114
>> clock driver. Can this patch be added to a stable branch in the clk or
>> arm-soc trees, which I can merge before applying the Tegra114 clock
>> driver? Thanks.
> 
> Yes.  I don't have an immutable branch today, but I will have one by
> -rc4.  It will be named clk-for-3.10.

Perhaps this series could be merged into an immutable topic branch of
its own. That could then be merged into your clk-for-3.10, and Tegra's
branch, and reduce the number of commits that get merged into the Tegra
tree from outside?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ