[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hak7m4b0.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:07:47 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: vgoyal@...hat.com, cpw@....com, kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp,
lisa.mitchell@...com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/21] vmcore: round up buffer size of ELF headers by PAGE_SIZE
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> writes:
> To satisfy mmap() page-size boundary requirement, round up buffer size
> of ELF headers by PAGE_SIZE. The resulting value becomes offset of ELF
> note segments and it's assigned in unique PT_NOTE program header
> entry.
Ok. That is just silly. You can use a single buffer for the ELF header,
the program header and the notes. It just requires a bit of counting
ahead of time.
The ELF header itself is small, and so are the program headers,
especially if you only have one PT_NOTE segment. The only thing that
possibly gets big is the note segment, and then that only happens if you
have a lot of cpus.
Since there are entirely local constructs it seems extremely silly,
wasteful and complicated to place each logical part in a separately
mmapable buffer instead of placing them in the same mmapable buffer.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists