[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363734031.2377.77.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:00:31 +0000
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: pull NV+BS variables out before we exit boot
services
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 18:50 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:40:56PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 18:28 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > It requires the key to survive the system being entirely powered down,
> > > which means it needs to be BS+NV. It shouldn't be possible for userspace
> > > to access this key.
> >
> > It requires the *public* key to survive power down, certainly. The
> > private key can be thrown away once the hibernate image is signed. I
> > think the scheme can be constructed so the private key is never in NV
> > storage ... that also makes it more secure against tampering.
>
> Well, that somewhat complicates implementation - we'd be encrypting the
> entire contents of memory except for the key that we're using to encrypt
> memory. Keeping the public key away from userspace avoids having to care
> about that.
I don't quite understand what you're getting at: the principle of public
key cryptography is that you can make the public key, well public. You
only need to guard the private key.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists