lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:35:25 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Cc:	Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>, kay@...y.org,
	linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, yuxiangl@...vell.com, yxlraid@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udevadm-info: Don't access sysfs 'resource<N>' files

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:09:22PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > Great, that's one possible solution, the other is just not creating the
> > files at all for known problem devices, right?
> 
> I don't think one can reasonably enumerate all problem devices. There
> are probably countless devices which can potentially break if their
> resources (especially IO ports) are read in unexpected ways. Aside
> from devices like this one, which apparently don't like certain IO
> ports being read with certain access widths, there's every device in
> existence with read-to-reset type registers. The fix to this needs to
> apply to all devices.
> 
> >
> > My main point here is, you aren't going to fix this in userspace, fix it
> > in the kernel.
> 
> The kernel can help the situation by blocking access to devices with
> an active driver, but it can't fix all cases. Suppose the device has
> no driver loaded yet, how is the kernel supposed to tell the
> difference between software with a legitimate need to access these
> files for virtualization device assignment, etc. and something like
> udevadm or a random grep command that's reading the files without any
> idea what it's doing? udevadm does need to be fixed to avoid accessing
> these files because it's unnecessary and dangerous.

Are you going to also fix grep?  bash?  cat?

Come on, be realistic.  If these files are so dangerous then they need
to just be removed entirely from the kernel.  You aren't going to be
able to patch grep for this.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ