[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130320154814.GY3042@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:48:14 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jack@...e.cz,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and
wq_numa_possible_cpumask[]
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:43:30PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > + for_each_node(node)
> > + BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var_node(&wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node],
> > + GFP_KERNEL, node));
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> > + if (WARN_ON(node == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
> > + pr_err("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
>
> since you used WARN_ON(), not BUG_ON(), I think you need to free
> allocated memory here.
I don't know. Is it necessary? It shouldn't happen sans bugs in arch
code and we're vomiting warning message with full stack trace. The
system will function but something is seriously screwed. I don't
think it matters whether we free the puny number of bytes there or
not and I don't wanna nest deeper there. :P
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists