[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130320160412.GZ3042@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:04:12 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jack@...e.cz,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two
functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:52:03PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > +static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> > + const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> > +{
> > + struct worker_pool *pool;
> > + struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
> > +
> > + pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
> > + if (!pool)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> this allocation is not numa-awared, you may use pool->node here.
Nice catch. Will do.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists