[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWPekbf=E98-dp+jXnXBdd+2dbzyEBCvr-ND6P2sTDXnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:21:31 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86, kdump: Set crashkernel_low automatically
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:53:29AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Have a general question about crashkernel_low. Why does it need to
>> > show up as "Crash kernel low" in /proc/iomem. Will it not be better
>> > that all memory reserved for crashkernel (whether high or low), shows
>> > as "Crash Kernel" and let kexec-tools decide whether to load kernel
>> > high or low etc.
>> >
>> > IOW, there should not be any need to differentiate between "Crash kernel"
>> > and "Crash kernel low". There are address ranges associated and looking
>> > at addresses it is obivious that certain memory is below 4G.
>>
>> yes. it is doable.
>> but
>> 1. will need to add more code to expand parse_iomem_single to handle
>> multiple "Crash kernel" in kexec-tools.
>> 2. also we already have "crashkernel_low=" in command line, so it is
>> good to keep them consistent in /proc/iomem.
>
> I think command line and /proc/iomem output are very different.
> crashkernel_low is just enforcing that reserve it below 4G and memory
> type still remains "Crash Kernel".
>
> So to me, /proc/iomem is showing ranges and memory type and both the
> memory types should be "Crash Kernel".
>
> IMHO, we should add code in kexec-tools to deal with it (multiple
> entries for memory type "Crash Kernel"), instead of especial casing
> "Crash Kernel Low". Who knows down the line we end up reserving more
> crash kernel memory which is not contiguous. Keeping all reserved
> memory of same type will help then.
ok.
Need to fix kexec-tools at first, and the drop Low in kernel.
Before v3.9 and kexec-tools 2.0.4?
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists