| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1363737629-16745-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:00:26 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, jack@...e.cz, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues
Currently, an unbound workqueue has only one "current" pool_workqueue
associated with it. It may have multple pool_workqueues but only the
first pool_workqueue servies new work items. For NUMA affinity, we
want to change this so that there are multiple current pool_workqueues
serving different NUMA nodes.
Introduce workqueue->numa_pwq_tbl[] which is indexed by NUMA node and
points to the pool_workqueue to use for each possible node. This
replaces first_pwq() in __queue_work() and workqueue_congested().
numa_pwq_tbl[] is currently initialized to point to the same
pool_workqueue as first_pwq() so this patch doesn't make any behavior
changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 25dab9d..3f820a5 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
unsigned int flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
+ struct pool_workqueue __rcu *numa_pwq_tbl[]; /* FR: unbound pwqs indexed by node */
};
static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache;
@@ -529,6 +530,22 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *first_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
pwqs_node);
}
+/**
+ * unbound_pwq_by_node - return the unbound pool_workqueue for the given node
+ * @wq: the target workqueue
+ * @node: the node ID
+ *
+ * This must be called either with pwq_lock held or sched RCU read locked.
+ * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
+ * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
+ */
+static struct pool_workqueue *unbound_pwq_by_node(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ int node)
+{
+ assert_rcu_or_pwq_lock();
+ return rcu_dereference_sched(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node]);
+}
+
static unsigned int work_color_to_flags(int color)
{
return color << WORK_STRUCT_COLOR_SHIFT;
@@ -1282,14 +1299,14 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
return;
retry:
+ if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+
/* pwq which will be used unless @work is executing elsewhere */
- if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
- if (cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
- cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
- } else {
- pwq = first_pwq(wq);
- }
+ else
+ pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
/*
* If @work was previously on a different pool, it might still be
@@ -1319,8 +1336,8 @@ retry:
* pwq is determined and locked. For unbound pools, we could have
* raced with pwq release and it could already be dead. If its
* refcnt is zero, repeat pwq selection. Note that pwqs never die
- * without another pwq replacing it as the first pwq or while a
- * work item is executing on it, so the retying is guaranteed to
+ * without another pwq replacing it in the numa_pwq_tbl or while
+ * work items are executing on it, so the retrying is guaranteed to
* make forward-progress.
*/
if (unlikely(!pwq->refcnt)) {
@@ -3635,6 +3652,8 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
struct worker_pool *pool,
struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
{
+ int node;
+
BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3662,8 +3681,11 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
/* link in @pwq */
list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+ if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
+ for_each_node(node)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+ }
spin_unlock_irq(&pwq_lock);
mutex_unlock(&wq->flush_mutex);
@@ -3759,12 +3781,16 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
struct lock_class_key *key,
const char *lock_name, ...)
{
+ size_t tbl_size = 0;
va_list args;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
/* allocate wq and format name */
- wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
+ tbl_size = wq_numa_tbl_len * sizeof(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[0]);
+
+ wq = kzalloc(sizeof(*wq) + tbl_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wq)
return NULL;
@@ -3991,7 +4017,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
else
- pwq = first_pwq(wq);
+ pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
ret = !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works);
preempt_enable();
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists