[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363743557.3573.50.camel@dahuang-vm>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:39:17 +0800
From: Danny Huang <dahuang@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: fuse: add fuctions to read speedo id and
process id
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 02:05 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/18/2013 08:33 PM, Danny Huang wrote:
> > Add functions to read the speedo and process id of both cpu and soc.
> > There might be some drivers need the information as well.
>
> What code wants to use these functions? It'd be best to submit this
> patch with that code, so that something actually uses the functions, and
> they don't look like dead code.
There are some developing drivers that are located in drivers folder
needs those information. I think that they can't include a header file
in mach-tegra folder. Hence I'd like to provide them such functions for
their development.
Is there any better way to do this?
>
> In the past, functions similar to this used to exist. However, they were
> removed and replaced by direct access to the underlying variables. Do we
> actually need functions for this, or can code simply read from the
> variables instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists