[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130320172445.GB28968@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:24:45 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] workqueue: add missing POOL_FREEZING
>From 12ee4fc67c00895b3d740297f7ca447239c1983b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 03:28:01 +0800
get_unbound_pool() forgot to set POOL_FREEZING if workqueue_freezing
is set and a new pool could go out of sync with the global freezing
state.
Fix it by adding POOL_FREEZING if workqueue_freezing. wq_mutex is
already held so no further locking is necessary. This also removes
the unused static variable warning when !CONFIG_FREEZER.
tj: Updated commit message.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index e38d035..40f4017 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3503,6 +3503,9 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
if (!pool || init_worker_pool(pool) < 0)
goto fail;
+ if (workqueue_freezing)
+ pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
+
lockdep_set_subclass(&pool->lock, 1); /* see put_pwq() */
copy_workqueue_attrs(pool->attrs, attrs);
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists