[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5149F9B4.2020400@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:02:28 -0500
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
CC: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@...il.com>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: video: omap2: dss: Use PTR_RET function
On 03/20/2013 11:59 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 2013-03-20 17:44, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 03/20/2013 06:56 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-19 10:03, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
>>>> Use PTR_RET function instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR.
>>>> Patch found using coccinelle.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuandru@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c | 5 +----
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c
>>>> index f8779d4..60cc6fe 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/core.c
>>>> @@ -181,10 +181,7 @@ int dss_debugfs_create_file(const char *name, void (*write)(struct seq_file *))
>>>> d = debugfs_create_file(name, S_IRUGO, dss_debugfs_dir,
>>>> write, &dss_debug_fops);
>>>>
>>>> - if (IS_ERR(d))
>>>> - return PTR_ERR(d);
>>>> -
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + return PTR_RET(d);
>>>> }
>>>> #else /* CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_DEBUGFS */
>>>> static inline int dss_initialize_debugfs(void)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I'll apply to omapdss tree.
>>
>> Is this correct? If debugfs_create_file() returns a valid pointer, then
>> now dss_debugfs_create_file() will return a non-zero value on success. I
>> don't think this is what you want. A similar case came up recently here [1].
>
> Hmm. I don't follow. And I don't understand the post where you referred.
>
> PTR_RET is defined as:
>
> if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> else
> return 0;
>
> How's that different from the original code?
Oops sorry, I missed that you were returning PTR_RET() and not
PTR_ERR(). Yes that looks fine. Sorry for the noise!
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists