[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6u2wNbPQSOPRCRO0To5UC-b8rXYanv2xv26hk5oaozvPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:38:03 +0000
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: remove /proc/device-tree
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:51 +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The same data is now available in sysfs, so we can remove the code
>> that exports it in /proc and replace it with a symlink to the sysfs
>> version.
>>
>> Tested on versatile qemu model and mpc5200 eval board. More testing
>> would be appreciated.
>
> NAK. It should at the very least be a CONFIG option for a while before
> completely switching over.
I'll modify patch 1 to create the symlink if CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE is
not set. After the first patch can be applied we can leave it for a
release or two before applying the second.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists