linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363820072.16270.43.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:54:32 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit

On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 17:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:22:16AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I've applied this but I'm fed up to the back teeth of having to hand
> > > edit trivial patches from you because you ignore the subject line styles
> > > of subsystems and make up your own.
> 
> > Your style rules just don't matter to me and
> > you can ignore the patches and fix it yourself.
> 
> > Or better, create a tool for others to use that
> > follow your silly style rules.
> 
> This is just like any other coding style thing - you should be creating
> patches that look like other patches for the affected, if there's things
> like obvious visual differences in what you're doing you're doing it
> wrong.

We've had this conversation before and I proposed
to you a simple solution.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/245
and I still more or less agree with Florian
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/16/314

I'm not doing it wrong.  You have another demand
others don't.  I simply don't find it necessary to
cater to you.

If you want it to be agreed that there is a specific
form for subject headers that varies by maintainer tree,
change SubmittingPatches Paragraph 11.

> Automation doesn't work for things like this, there's a good solid
> reason why there's generally a human involved in patch; the other people
> who submit lots of cleanups generally manage to figure this out
> usefully, you might want to discuss techniques with them.

I suggest you use a git pre-commit hook to your
tree and use sed/perl to add a specific prefix
if it doesn't exist.
http://codeinthehole.com/writing/tips-for-using-a-git-pre-commit-hook/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/