[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363823921.25034.35@snotra>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:58:41 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
<linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MA..." <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: allow host header to be included even for
!CONFIG_KVM
On 03/14/2013 07:13:46 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> The new context tracking subsystem unconditionally includes kvm_host.h
> headers for the guest enter/exit macros. This causes a compile
> failure when KVM is not enabled.
>
> Fix by adding an IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) check to kvm_host so it can
> be included/compiled even when KVM is not enabled.
>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> ---
> Applies on v3.9-rc2
>
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This broke the PPC non-KVM build, which was relying on stub functions
in kvm_ppc.h, which relies on "struct vcpu" in kvm_host.h.
Why can't the entirety kvm_host.h be included regardless of CONFIG_KVM,
just like most other feature-specific headers? Why can't the if/else
just go around the functions that you want to stub out for non-KVM
builds?
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists