lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:16:20 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vgoyal@...hat.com, cpw@....com,
	kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp, lisa.mitchell@...com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore

HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> writes:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] kdump, vmcore: support mmap() on /proc/vmcore
> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:30:05 -0700
>
>> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:00:47 +0900 HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Currently, read to /proc/vmcore is done by read_oldmem() that uses
>>> ioremap/iounmap per a single page. For example, if memory is 1GB,
>>> ioremap/iounmap is called (1GB / 4KB)-times, that is, 262144
>>> times. This causes big performance degradation.
>>> 
>>> In particular, the current main user of this mmap() is makedumpfile,
>>> which not only reads memory from /proc/vmcore but also does other
>>> processing like filtering, compression and IO work. Update of page
>>> table and the following TLB flush makes such processing much slow;
>>> though I have yet to make patch for makedumpfile and yet to confirm
>>> how it's improved.
>>> 
>>> To address the issue, this patch implements mmap() on /proc/vmcore to
>>> improve read performance. My simple benchmark shows the improvement
>>> from 200 [MiB/sec] to over 50.0 [GiB/sec].
>> 
>> There are quite a lot of userspace-visible vmcore changes here.  Is it
>> all fully back-compatible?  Will all known userspace continue to work
>> OK on newer kernels?
>> 
>
> I designed it to keep backward-compatibility at least for gdb and
> binutils but not less for makedumpfile since it should follow kernel
> changes; old makedumpfile cannot use newer kernels, and this is within
> the range of this review.

To the extent possible we should different versions of tools to be
interchanged.  That helps with bug hunting and for people who are in
resource constrained systems that build old versions of the tools that
are tiny and fit.

Given that rounding the per cpu NOTES turns out to be a waste of memory
I didn't see anything in the patchset that justfies any breakage.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ