lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEtk5gd=DwbLs4baj2NABPRs6sXjehLUiKDKhKUr0UfFwwVibQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:56:38 -0700
From:	Vijay <thelonejoker@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Workqueue behaviour - Synchronization within submitted work

In the new workqueue architecture, I have a question regarding
synchronization between different "work" submitted to the same
workqueue. For example:

* I submit two sets of "work" A and B, to a common driver specific
workqueue (W).
* Each A and B, meddle with a certain shared data SD.
* Am I guaranteed serialized execution of A and B, or should I play
safe and use a semaphore (acquire/release) with A and B ?

Thanks,
Vijay

PS: Please CC me in the reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ