| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:42:15 +0000 From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: remove /proc/device-tree On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 08:16 +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 07:35 +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> > Shouldn't we have the symlink just be a config option itself ? >> >> > Eventually distros might want get rid of it completely .. >> >> >> >> Why? It is the cheapest thing in the world and it means the ABI >> >> doesn't change at all. >> > >> > It's also gross and forces sysfs to remain in /sys which isn't a kernel >> > enforced policy afaik. >> >> Documentation/sysfs-rules.txt, Line 30 > > Whatever... it's still gross :-) ptffff! g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists