[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1303211101530.1899-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Rajagopal Venkat <rajagopal.venkat@...aro.org>
cc: myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
<linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: tie suspend/resume to runtime-pm
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Rajagopal Venkat wrote:
> Allow device devfreq to be suspend/resume automatically with
> runtime pm suspend/resume. The devfreq drivers should be least
> cared when to suspend/resume the devfreq.
>
> pm_runtime_suspend(dev) will first suspend device devfreq(if available)
> before device is suspended from runtime pm core.
>
> pm_runtime_resume(dev) will resume device devfreq(if available) after
> device is resumed from runtime pm core.
Aren't these backward? The device continues to need its clocks and
frequency settings until _after_ it has been suspended. Similarly, it
needs them to be available _before_ it resumes.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists