[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321153725.GA3656@austin.hallyn.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:37:25 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@...hat.com):
...
> Giving CAP_MODIFY_KERNEL to processess upon signature verification
> will simplify things a bit.
>
> Only thing is that signature verification alone is not sufficient. We
> also need to make sure after signature verification executable can
> not be modified in memory in any way. So that means atleast couple of
> things.
Also what about context? If I construct a mounts namespace a certain
way, can I trick this executable into loading an old singed bzImage that
I had laying around?
ISTM the only sane thing to do, if you're going down this road,
is to have CAP_MODIFIY_KERNEL pulled from bounding set for everyone
except a getty started by init on ttyS0. Then log in on serial
to update. Or run a damon with CAP_MODIFIY_KERNEL which listens
to a init_net_ns netlink socket for very basic instructions, like
"find and install latest signed bzImage in /boot". Then you can
at least trust that /boot for that daemon is not faked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists