[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1303211257420.9518@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:58:04 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:47 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > > This patch introduces CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL.
> >
> > I'd like to see this named CAP_MODIFY_KERNEL, which is more accurate and
> > less emotive. Otherwise I think core kernel developers will be scratching
> > their head over where to sprinkle this.
> >
> > Apart from that, I like the idea, especially when it's wired up to MAC
> > security.
>
> Matthrew, perhaps you could clarify whether this will be tied to MAC
> security.
All capabilities are, via LSM.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists