linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 01/10] clocksource: add generic dummy timer driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <514B4DBD.4060403@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:13:17 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 01/10] clocksource: add generic dummy timer driver

On 03/21/13 11:09, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I've just been trying to test the dummy timer, and realised it's broken, as it
> registers a cpu notifier from a device_initcall (after SMP's been brought up),
> and doesn't ensure all active CPUs have been set up. Evidently no-one else has
> attempted to test it thus far, and I'm not able to throughly test it at the
> moment.

Would it be sufficient to register as a pre-smp initcall?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/