[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321183513.GC20500@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:35:13 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, skinsbursky@...allels.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, jmorris@...ei.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
jlayton@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] idr: implement idr_alloc() and convert existing users
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:06:18AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Ooh, BTW, the cyclic allocation is broken. It's prone to -ENOSPC
> > after the first wraparound. There are several cyclic users in the
> > kernel and I think it probably would be best to implement cyclic
> > support in idr.
>
> Are you looking at this, by the way, or do you have any suggestions?
>
> Wondering if it's something I should try to fix or if I should look into
> converting to some other data structure here.
I am not working on it at the moment but I think the logical thing to
do would be implementing cyclic support in idr and enabling it with,
say, a different initializer - IDR_CYCLIC_INIT() or something. If you
wanna fix it, please go ahead. :)
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists