[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013d8e4c5d16-505199e0-9117-48e5-9280-951b42797209-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:53:22 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
khilman@...aro.org, geoff@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz1: Documentation
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> For now, no, if more than one process is scheduled on the CPU, we fall
> out of dynamic tick mode. In the future, we can add SCHED_FIFO task
> scheduled in to trigger it. But lets conquer that after we successfully
> conquer the current changes.
Be glad to see whatever is possible merged as soon as possible. But be
aware that we will fall out of dyntick mode at mininum every 2 seconds
because that is when the per cpu vm stats and the slab scanning is
occurring. These are both deferrable activities.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists