[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321192935.GY21522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:29:35 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: VFS deadlock ?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:06:53PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Showing all locks held in the system:
> 4 locks on stack by trinity-child2/7669:
> #0: blocked: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, instance: ffff8801292d17d8, at: [<ffffffff811df134>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50
> #1: held: (&type->s_vfs_rename_key){+.+.+.}, instance: ffff8801292d1928, at: [<ffffffff811c6f5e>] lock_rename+0x3e/0x120
> #2: held: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#2/1){+.+.+.}, instance: ffff880110b3a858, at: [<ffffffff811c701e>] lock_rename+0xfe/0x120
> #3: blocked: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#2/2){+.+.+.}, instance: ffff880110b3a858, at: [<ffffffff811c7034>] lock_rename+0x114/0x120
#0 oddity aside, that looks very much like directory aliased by two different
dentries. Try to add
BUG_ON(p1->d_inode == p2->d_inode);
just before
mutex_lock(&p1->d_inode->i_sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex);
and see if it triggers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists