[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514B6E5F.2040405@am.sony.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:32:31 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"steve.glendinning@...c.com" <steve.glendinning@...c.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] bisected: PandaBoard smsc95xx ethernet driver error from
USB timeout
On 03/21/13 13:25, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 03/21/13 02:00, Ming Lei wrote:
< snip >
> ----------
> There are some timeout messages that I am not positive are symptoms of
> the problem. With these messages, the smsc95xx driver initialization is
> successful, so the ethernet device is available. For the first bisect
> attempt, I did not treat these messages as errors. For the second bisect
> attempt I treated these messages as errors. A typical example of the
> timeout message is:
>
> [ 9.537811] hub 1-1:1.0: state 7 ports 5 chg 0000 evt 0002
> [ 17.056701] usb 1-1.1: swapper/0 timed out on ep0out len=0/4
> [ 17.062652] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: Failed to write register index 0x00000108
> [ 17.070343] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: Failed to write ADDRL: -110
> [ 17.076751] IP-Config: Failed to open eth0
Oops, pasted the wrong example. This is an example of a timeout, but the
driver still works, and the system boots:
[ 6.072357] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: register 'smsc95xx' at usb-ehci-omap.0-1.1, smsc95xx USB 2.0 Ethernet, fa:50:73:02:79:67
[ 6.084655] hub 1-1:1.0: state 7 ports 5 chg 0000 evt 0002
[ 11.220672] usb 1-1.1: swapper/0 timed out on ep0out len=4/4
[ 18.183441] usb 1-1.1: link qh8-0001/dc8d6640 start 2 [1/0 us]
[ 19.822296] IP-Config: Complete:
>
> The mention of swapper is not relevent, it just happens to be the
> current process when the time out occurs.
>
> I have only seen these timeout messages in the boot log, so they may not
> be a very visible symptom. They also _might_ be unrelated to the problem,
> but my gut feel is that they are related.
< snip >
-Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists