[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1303211708470.1899-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Soeren Moch <smoch@....de>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: fix for leaking isochronous data
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Soeren Moch wrote:
>
> > Now I found out what is going on here:
> >
> > In itd_urb_transaction() we allocate 9 iTDs for each URB with
> > number_of_packets == 64 in my case. The iTDs are added to
> > sched->td_list. For a frame-aligned scheduling we need 8 iTDs, the 9th
> > one is released back to the front of the streams free_list in
> > iso_sched_free(). This iTD was cleared after allocation and has a frame
> > number of 0 now. So for each allocation when now_frame == 0 we allocate
> > from the dma_pool, not from the free_list.
>
> Okay, that is a problem. But it shouldn't be such a big problem,
> because now_frame should not be equal to 0 very often.
Oh, wait, now I get it. We never reach a steady state, because the
free list never shrinks, but occasionally it does increase when
now_frame is equal to 0. Even though that doesn't happen very often,
the effects add up.
Very good; tomorrow I will send your patch in.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists