[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321212623.GK15926@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:26:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: max98090: Remove executable bit
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:40:22PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 21:37 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > you routinely send very trivial
> > patches which don't apply cleanly
> That's demonstrably false.
It's sadly not, at least for the things I get to see - as far as I have
been able to tell you submit against either Linus' tree or the last
release (I think the former) rather than the relevant development trees
or even -next which means that if anyone else has looked at the same
area of code there will be conflicts.
> I'm done with this conversation.
Oh, well. Hopefully you'll take on board the feedback.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists