[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130322102808.5bdd9e5e0d98733e202e49c2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:28:08 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Bill Pemberton <wfp5p@...idian.itc.virginia.edu>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
Hi Greg,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:54:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:16:28 -0700 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:15:11AM -0400, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> > > Jiri Slaby writes:
> > > >
> > > > On 03/20/2013 03:42 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Asking Greg to revert should suffice. I commented on that patch, but in
> > > > a different thread, so Greg missed the comment the patch is not needed
> > > > IIRC. What was the title of the patch, I cannot find it immediately :/?
> > >
> > > "USB: quatech2: only write to the tty if the port is open." (commit
> > > 27b351c in v3.9-rc3).
> >
> > I've now reverted this, so it should be ok.
>
> That patch needed to be reverted in your tty tree, not your usb tree
> since it breaks a patch added to your tty tree (see Subject).
Except, of course, commit 27b351c is not in your tty tree :-(
I will continue to carry a revert of 27b351c as a merge fix for when I
merge the tty tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists