linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ath9k : Fix ieee80211 work while going to suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130322091342.GB1496@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:13:42 +0100
From:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@....qualcomm.com>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
	Jouni Malinen <jouni@....qualcomm.com>,
	Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@....qualcomm.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	senthilb@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k : Fix ieee80211 work while going to suspend

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33:31PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> So when does this work get called?
> 
> Given the trace this is hit when the timer rx_poll_timer runs,
> which in turn calls ath_rx_poll() to schedule hw_check_work work.
> The rx_poll_timer however was originally only set at the end of
> the routine that hw_check_work sets off but also at other entry
> points (ath_start_rx_poll() callers). Once ath_start_rx_poll()
> gets called though we can go on looping as follows:
> 
> work			timer			work
> hw_check_work	-->	rx_poll_timer	-->	hw_check_work
>
> At suspend time we do this though:
> 
> ath_cancel_work(sc);                                                    
> del_timer_sync(&sc->rx_poll_timer);  
>  
> +	del_timer_sync(&sc->rx_poll_timer);
>  	ath_cancel_work(sc);
>  	ath_stop_ani(sc);
> -	del_timer_sync(&sc->rx_poll_timer);

[snip]

> But then we have the chicken and the egg problem, as the work item
> could fire off the timer so it would seem to be good to prevent
> adding new work when suspending.

Yup, this is egg and chicken problem, I think it can not be fixed by
changing ordering of del_timer and cancel_work, it would be like:

del_timer_sync(&sc->rx_poll_timer);
/* but timer could schedule work */
ath_cancel_work(sc);
/* but work could schedule timer */ 
del_timer_sync(&sc->rx_poll_timer);
/* but timer could schedule work */
ath_cancel_work(sc);
/* And so on ... */

Check is needed in work or timer callback, depending what is canceled
last, to fix the problem ...

> > In mac80211 we use local->suspended and local->quiesce booleans to
> > prevent reschedule of timers when going to suspend for example.
> > Works use ifmgd->associted to prevent reschedule when we are
> > disassociating.
> > 
> > I think on ath9k also some boolean variable should be used, not only
> > for rx_poll_timer but also for other works i.e. tx_complete_work.
> > Is possible to use SC_OP_INVALID flags, since mac80211 call ath9k_stop
> > on suspend and ath9k_start on resume.
> 
> Indeed however ieee80211_queue_work() already does a suspend check for
> us, it just complains as many drivers including mac80211 were setting
> up work incorrectly. The warning was put in place to help us find the
> issues. Using SC_OP_INVALID seems fair but we could also add a routine
> ieee80211_queue_work_safe() that silently fails if we are quiescing or
> suspended and not resuming but I can see that creating very sloppy
> driver writing and everyone abusing it.

We also have to reliable cancel works on ath9k_stop() if device goes
down for other reason than suspend, new mac80211 ieee80211_queue_work_safe()
routine will not help with that.

> OK how about this for stable for now:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c
> index 39c84ec..7fdac6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/link.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ void ath_rx_poll(unsigned long data)
>  {
>  	struct ath_softc *sc = (struct ath_softc *)data;
>  
> -	ieee80211_queue_work(sc->hw, &sc->hw_check_work);
> +	if (!test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags))
> +		ieee80211_queue_work(sc->hw, &sc->hw_check_work);
>  }

That looks ok for me as -stable fix

Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>

Stanislaw 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/