[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303221025530.22263@ionos>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:26:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/34] arch: Consolidate tsk_is_polling()
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:57PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Idle thread specific functions to determine the need_resched
> > + * polling state. We have two versions, one based on TS_POLLING in
> > + * thread_info.status and one based on TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG in
> > + * thread_info.flags
> > + */
> > +#ifdef TS_POLLING
> > +static inline int tsk_is_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + return task_thread_info(p)->status & TS_POLLING;
> > +}
> > +#elif defined(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG)
> > +static inline int tsk_is_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> > +}
>
> On powerpc (at least) this is used before it's declared. Also I think
> you're missing a 'return' in that function.
Mooo
> *cough* https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ *cough*
Yes, I know. /me feels bad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists