[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322093750.GA679@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:37:50 +0000
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] PCI: Introduce new MSI chip infrastructure
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:51:46AM +0000, Thierry Reding wrote:
> index ce93a34..ea4a5be 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -58,5 +58,15 @@ extern int arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type);
> extern void arch_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> extern int arch_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev* dev, int nvec, int type);
>
> +struct msi_chip {
> + struct module *owner;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + int (*setup_irq)(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
> + struct msi_desc *desc);
> + void (*teardown_irq)(struct msi_chip *chip, unsigned int irq);
> + int (*check_device)(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
> + int nvec, int type);
> +};
Is there a need to add setup_irqs and teardown_irqs functions here? This will
allow your MSI chips to support multiple MSIs per requesting device.
What about restore_msi_irqs? Does this fit in here too?
Andrew Murray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists