lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878v5ggv3s.fsf@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:02:15 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To:	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	"open list\:KERNEL VIRTUAL MA..." <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: allow host header to be included even for !CONFIG_KVM

Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:33:13PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 03/21/2013 02:16:00 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:42:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> On 03/21/2013 09:27:14 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> >Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:58:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> >>> Why can't the entirety kvm_host.h be included regardless of
>> >> >>> CONFIG_KVM, just like most other feature-specific headers?  Why
>> >> >>> can't the if/else just go around the functions that you want to
>> >> >stub
>> >> >>> out for non-KVM builds?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> Kevin,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  What compilation failure this patch fixes? I presume
>> >something ARM
>> >> >> related.
>> >> >
>> >> >Not specficially ARM related, but more context tracking related
>> >since
>> >> >kernel/context_tracking.c pulls in kvm_host.h, which attempts to
>> >> >pull in
>> >> ><asm/kvm*.h> which may not exist on some platforms.
>> >> >
>> >> >At least for ARM, KVM support was added in v3.9 so this patch can
>> >> >probably be dropped since the non-KVM builds on ARM now work.
>> >But any
>> >> >platform without the <asm/kvm*.h> will still be broken when
>> >trying to
>> >> >build the context tracker.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe other platforms should get empty asm/kvm*.h files.  Is there
>> >> anything from those files that the linux/kvm*.h headers need to
>> >> build?
>> >>
>> >arch things. kvm_vcpu_arch, kvm_arch_memory_slot, kvm_arch etc.
>> 
>> Could define them as empty structs.
>> 
> Isn't is simpler for kernel/context_tracking.c to define empty
> __guest_enter()/__guest_exit() if !CONFIG_KVM.

I proposed something like that in an earlier version but Frederic asked
me to propose a fix to the KVM headers instead.

Just in case fixing the context tracking subsystem is preferred, 
the patch below fixes the problem also.

Kevin

>From f22995a262144d0d61705fa72134694d911283eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:57:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] context_tracking: fix !CONFIG_KVM compile: add stub guest
 enter/exit

When KVM is not enabled, or not available on a platform, the KVM
headers should not be included.  Instead, just define stub
__guest_[enter|exit] functions.

Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/context_tracking.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/context_tracking.c b/kernel/context_tracking.c
index 65349f0..64b0f80 100644
--- a/kernel/context_tracking.c
+++ b/kernel/context_tracking.c
@@ -15,12 +15,18 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/context_tracking.h>
-#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#else
+#define __guest_enter()
+#define __guest_exit()
+#endif
+
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct context_tracking, context_tracking) = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_FORCE
 	.active = true,
-- 
1.8.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ