linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1363955155-18382-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:25:53 +0100
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, pjt@...gle.com,
	santosh.shilimkar@...com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	chander.kashyap@...aro.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	tony.luck@...el.com
Cc:	alex.shi@...el.com, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	amit.kucheria@...aro.org, corbet@....net,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics

If a CPU accesses the runnable_avg_sum and runnable_avg_period fields of its
buddy CPU while the latter updates it, it can get the new version of a field
and the old version of the other one. This can generate erroneous decisions.
We don't want to use a lock mechanism for ensuring the coherency because of
the overhead in this critical path. The previous attempt can't ensure
coherency of both fields for 100% of the platform and use case as it will
depend of the toolchain and the platform architecture.
The runnable_avg_period of a runqueue tends to the max value in less than
345ms after plugging a CPU, which implies that we could use the max value
instead of reading runnable_avg_period after 345ms. During the starting phase,
we must ensure a minimum of coherency between the fields. A simple rule is
runnable_avg_sum <= runnable_avg_period.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 021c7b7..b636199 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3364,13 +3364,16 @@ done:
 static bool is_buddy_busy(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	u32 sum = rq->avg.runnable_avg_sum;
+	u32 period = rq->avg.runnable_avg_period;
+
+	sum = min(sum, period);

 	/*
 	 * A busy buddy is a CPU with a high load or a small load with a lot of
 	 * running tasks.
 	 */
-	return (rq->avg.runnable_avg_sum >
-			(rq->avg.runnable_avg_period / (rq->nr_running + 2)));
+	return (sum > (period / (rq->nr_running + 2)));
 }

 static bool is_light_task(struct task_struct *p)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/