linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <514BB23E.70908@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:22:06 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: fix memcg_cache_name() to use cgroup_name()

On 2013/3/21 18:22, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 21-03-13 10:08:49, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 21-03-13 09:22:21, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> As cgroup supports rename, it's unsafe to dereference dentry->d_name
>>> without proper vfs locks. Fix this by using cgroup_name().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch depends on "cgroup: fix cgroup_path() vs rename() race",
>>> which has been queued for 3.10.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++--------
>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 53b8201..72be5c9 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -3217,17 +3217,16 @@ void mem_cgroup_destroy_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
>>>  static char *memcg_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s)
>>>  {
>>>  	char *name;
>>> -	struct dentry *dentry;
>>> +
>>> +	name = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_TEMPORARY);
>>
>> Ouch. Can we use a static temporary buffer instead?
> 
>> This is called from workqueue context so we do not have to be afraid
>> of the deep call chain.
> 
> Bahh, I was thinking about two things at the same time and that is how
> it ends... I meant a temporary buffer on the stack. But a separate
> allocation sounds even easier.
> 

Actually I don't care much about which way to take. Use on-stack buffer (if stack
usage is not a concern) or local static buffer (caller already held memcg_cache_mutex)
is simplest.

But why it's bad to allocate a page for temp use?

>> It is also not a hot path AFAICS.
>>
>> Even GFP_ATOMIC for kasprintf would be an improvement IMO.
> 
> What about the following (not even compile tested because I do not have
> cgroup_name in my tree yet):

No, it won't compile. ;)

> ---
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f608546..ede0382 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3370,13 +3370,18 @@ static char *memcg_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s)
>  	struct dentry *dentry;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	dentry = rcu_dereference(memcg->css.cgroup->dentry);
> +	name = kasprintf(GFP_ATOMIC, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
> +			 memcg_cache_id(memcg), cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup));
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -	BUG_ON(dentry == NULL);
> -
> -	name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
> -			 memcg_cache_id(memcg), dentry->d_name.name);
> +	if (!name) {
> +		name = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		name = snprintf(name, PAGE_SIZE, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
> +				memcg_cache_id(memcg),
> +				cgroup_name(memcg->css.cgroup));
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +	}
>  
>  	return name;
>  }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/