linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: cleanup for DT usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201303221520.54322.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:20:54 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"spear-devel" <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: cleanup for DT usage

On Friday 22 March 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> It includes few cleanups when used with DT. Patch 4/4 is a modified version of
> the [1].
> 
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg225366.html
> 
> Andy Shevchenko (3):
>   dw_dmac: fix style of the comments
>   dw_dmac: rename DT related methods to reflect their belonging
>   dw_dmac: make build of DT related methods optional
> 
> Arnd Bergmann (1):
>   dmaengine: dw_dmac: simplify master selection
> 

Thanks for following up on this!

The first two patches look good to me, but I think the third one is not
needed, since the interface was meant to work without the need for #ifdef
hacks in drivers.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/