[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130323060455.78a4c90c3f1e028434818fd1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:04:55 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, rob@...dley.net, mturquette@...aro.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, cooloney@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com, wim@...ana.be,
lgirdwood@...il.com, gg@...mlogic.co.uk, j-keerthy@...com,
ldewangan@...dia.com, t-kristo@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:55:10 +0000 Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk> wrote:
>
> This patchset adds to the support for the Palmas series of PMIC chips.
>
> Some of the patches have previously been submitted individually.
> The DT bindings doc has been added first due to comments that it was missing.
>
> Patches based on linux-next-20130319
I can't really comment on the patch set except to say that you should not
base on linux-next, you should base on the tree to which you expect the
patch set to be applied.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists