[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322223425.GA5638@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:34:28 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@...hat.com>,
Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Paul Taysom <taysom@...omium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: dm: dm-cache fails to write the cache device in writethrough mode
On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 4:11pm -0400,
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
> The new writethrough strategy for dm-cache issues a bio to the origin device,
> remaps the bio to the cache device, and issues the bio to the cache device.
> However, the block layer modifies bi_sector and bi_size, so we need to preserve
> these or else nothing gets written to the cache (bi_size == 0). This fixes the
> problem where someone writes a block through the cache, but a subsequent reread
> (from the cache) returns old contents.
Your writethrough blkid test results are certainly strange. But I'm not
aware of where the block layer would modify bi_size and bi_sector;
please elaborate.
I cannot reproduce your original report. I developed
'test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match', apologies for the ruby code:
def test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match
size = meg(10)
# wipe the origin to ensure we don't accidentally have the same
# data on it.
with_standard_linear(:data_size => size) do |origin|
wipe_device(origin)
end
uuid = "deadbeef-cafe-dead-beef-cafedeadbeef"
# format the cache device with a specific uuid
with_standard_cache(:format => true,
:io_mode => :writethrough,
:data_size => size) do |cache|
fs = FS::file_system(:ext4, cache)
fs.format(:uuid => uuid)
FS::assert_fs_uuid(uuid, cache)
end
# origin should have the same uuid as the cache
with_standard_linear(:data_size => size) do |origin|
FS::assert_fs_uuid(uuid, origin)
end
end
This test was committed to the 'devel' branch of my thinp-test-suite
tree: git://github.com/snitm/thinp-test-suite.git
Also the existing 'test_writethrough' test works fine.
So for now:
Nacked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists