[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130322052010.GB31022@thor.bakeyournoodle.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:20:11 +1100
From: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/34] arch: Consolidate tsk_is_polling()
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:52:57PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +/*
> + * Idle thread specific functions to determine the need_resched
> + * polling state. We have two versions, one based on TS_POLLING in
> + * thread_info.status and one based on TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG in
> + * thread_info.flags
> + */
> +#ifdef TS_POLLING
> +static inline int tsk_is_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + return task_thread_info(p)->status & TS_POLLING;
> +}
> +#elif defined(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG)
> +static inline int tsk_is_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> +}
On powerpc (at least) this is used before it's declared. Also I think
you're missing a 'return' in that function.
*cough* https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ *cough*
Yours Tony
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists