[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130323174605.GA3649@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:46:05 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Frank Eigler <fche@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
adrian.m.negreanu@...el.com, Torsten.Polle@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] uretprobes: return probe entry, prepare_uretprobe()
On 03/22, Anton Arapov wrote:
>
> @@ -1513,20 +1596,26 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct uprobe_consumer *uc;
> int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
> + bool prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */
> int rc = 0;
>
> down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
> if (uc->handler)
> rc = uc->handler(uc, regs);
> - else
> + else {
> + prep |= true;
> remove = 0;
> + }
This looks wrong (see also my reply to 1/7).
What if uc->handler != NULL and uc->ret_handler != NULL ? We need
if (uc->rer_handler)
need_prep = true;
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists