[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130323190726.GA30029@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:07:26 +0000
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] wfcqueue: functions for local append and enqueue
With level-triggered epoll, append/enqueue operations to the
local/locked queues increase performance by avoiding unnecessary atomic
operations and barriers. These are necessary to avoid performance
regressions when looping through ep_send_events and appending many
items to a local queue.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
---
I noticed the original __wfcq_append function was not in the
synchronization table, so I left out ___wfcq_append from the table
as well.
include/linux/wfcqueue.h | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/wfcqueue.h b/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
index 9464a0c..800b1dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/wfcqueue.h
@@ -55,14 +55,16 @@
* [4] __wfcq_splice (source queue)
* [5] __wfcq_first
* [6] __wfcq_next
+ * [7] __wfcq_enqueue
*
- * [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
- * [1] - - - - - -
- * [2] - - - - - -
- * [3] - - X X X X
- * [4] - - X - X X
- * [5] - - X X - -
- * [6] - - X X - -
+ * [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
+ * [1] - - - - - - X
+ * [2] - - - - - - X
+ * [3] - - X X X X X
+ * [4] - - X - X X X
+ * [5] - - X X - - X
+ * [6] - - X X - - X
+ * [7] X X X X X X X
*
* Besides locking, mutual exclusion of dequeue, splice and iteration
* can be ensured by performing all of those operations from a single
@@ -205,6 +207,49 @@ static inline bool wfcq_enqueue(struct wfcq_head *head,
}
/*
+ * ___wfcq_append: append one local queue to another local queue
+ *
+ * No memory barriers are issued. Mutual exclusion is the responsibility
+ * of the caller.
+ *
+ * Returns false if the queue was empty prior to adding the node.
+ * Returns true otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool ___wfcq_append(struct wfcq_head *head,
+ struct wfcq_tail *tail,
+ struct wfcq_node *new_head,
+ struct wfcq_node *new_tail)
+{
+ struct wfcq_node *old_tail;
+
+ old_tail = tail->p;
+ tail->p = new_tail;
+ old_tail->next = new_head;
+
+ /*
+ * Return false if queue was empty prior to adding the node,
+ * else return true.
+ */
+ return old_tail != &head->node;
+}
+
+/*
+ * __wfcq_enqueue: enqueue a node into a local queue
+ *
+ * No memory barriers are issued. Mutual exclusion is the responsibility
+ * of the caller.
+ *
+ * Returns false if the queue was empty prior to adding the node.
+ * Returns true otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool __wfcq_enqueue(struct wfcq_head *head,
+ struct wfcq_tail *tail,
+ struct wfcq_node *new_tail)
+{
+ return ___wfcq_append(head, tail, new_tail, new_tail);
+}
+
+/*
* ___wfcq_busy_wait: busy-wait.
*/
static inline void ___wfcq_busy_wait(void)
--
1.8.2.rc3.2.geae6cf5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists