linux-kernel - Re: [patch 05/34] idle: Implement generic idle function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130323085647.GB3530@osiris>
Date:	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 09:56:47 +0100
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/34] idle: Implement generic idle function

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 09:53:00PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> All idle functions in arch/* are more or less the same, plus minus a
> few bugs and extra instrumentation, tickless support and other
> optional items.
> 
> Implement a generic idle function which resembles the functionality
> found in arch/. Provide weak arch_cpu_idle_* functions which can be
> overridden by the architecture code if needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

[...]

> +static void cpu_idle_loop(void)
> +{
> +	while (1) {
> +		tick_nohz_idle_enter();
> +
> +		while (!need_resched()) {
> +			check_pgt_cache();
> +			rmb();
> +
> +			if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
> +				arch_cpu_idle_dead();
> +
> +			local_irq_disable();
> +			arch_cpu_idle_enter();
> +
> +			if (cpu_idle_force_poll) {
> +				cpu_idle_poll();
> +			} else {
> +				current_clr_polling();
> +				if (!need_resched()) {
> +					stop_critical_timings();
> +					rcu_idle_enter();
> +					arch_cpu_idle();
> +					WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());

This should be WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()), no?

> +					rcu_idle_exit();
> +					start_critical_timings();
> +				} else {
> +					local_irq_enable();
> +				}
> +				current_set_polling();
> +			}
> +			arch_cpu_idle_exit();
> +		}
> +		tick_nohz_idle_exit();

I was wondering why the scheduler doesn't complain when being called with
irqs disabled. In fact tick_nohz_idle_exit() enables irqs unconditionally
iff CONFIG_NO_HZ is set.

> +		schedule_preempt_disabled();
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state)
> +{
> +	current_set_polling();
> +	arch_cpu_idle_prepare();
> +	cpu_idle_loop();
> +}
> +#endif

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/