lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <514EF148.7060106@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:27:52 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2, part4 37/39] mm: use totalram_pages instead of
 num_physpages at runtime

Hello.

On 24-03-2013 11:25, Jiang Liu wrote:

> The global variable num_physpages is scheduled to be removed, so use
> totalram_pages instead of num_physpages at runtime.

> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> Cc: fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>   fs/fuse/inode.c          |    2 +-
>   kernel/power/snapshot.c  |    4 ++--
>   net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c |    2 +-
>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> index b730fda..4c2a420 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static const struct super_operations fuse_super_operations = {
>   static void sanitize_global_limit(unsigned *limit)
>   {
>   	if (*limit == 0)
> -		*limit = ((num_physpages << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 13) /
> +		*limit = ((totalram_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 13) /
>   			 sizeof(struct fuse_req);
>
>   	if (*limit >= 1 << 16)
> diff --git a/kernel/power/snapshot.c b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> index 0de2857..8b5d1cd 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ unsigned long snapshot_get_image_size(void)
>   static int init_header(struct swsusp_info *info)
>   {
>   	memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct swsusp_info));
> -	info->num_physpages = num_physpages;
> +	info->num_physpages = get_num_physpages();
>   	info->image_pages = nr_copy_pages;
>   	info->pages = snapshot_get_image_size();
>   	info->size = info->pages;
> @@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ static int check_header(struct swsusp_info *info)
>   	char *reason;
>
>   	reason = check_image_kernel(info);
> -	if (!reason && info->num_physpages != num_physpages)
> +	if (!reason && info->num_physpages != get_num_physpages())
>   		reason = "memory size";
>   	if (reason) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "PM: Image mismatch: %s\n", reason);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> index 4750d2b..94a99a1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void inet_frags_init(struct inet_frags *f)
>
>   	rwlock_init(&f->lock);
>
> -	f->rnd = (u32) ((num_physpages ^ (num_physpages>>7)) ^
> +	f->rnd = (u32) ((totalram_pages ^ (totalram_pages>>7)) ^
>   				   (jiffies ^ (jiffies >> 6)));
>
>   	setup_timer(&f->secret_timer, inet_frag_secret_rebuild,

    Isn't patch 37 the same as patch 9?

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ