linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] [CPUFREQ] 3.9.0-rcX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1965505.vyQ4xZcodg@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:53:54 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>
Cc:	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] [CPUFREQ] 3.9.0-rcX

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 07:59:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 March 2013 19:41, Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com> wrote:
> > (long e-mail, sorry ;-))
> 
> Don't be, it was useful :)
> 
> > Last known good: 3.8.0
> >
> > Short description:
> > 1. On -rc3, after s2ram cpufreq does not set CPU on max frequency on high
> > load (on battery).
> 
> Try attached patch for this.
> 
> > 2. On -rc4 (this is not real regression because I change config between -rc3
> > and rc4), "ondemand" does not work. Current frequency is 'strange' (792
> > MHz).
> 
> I don't really have a reason for that :(
> But with your config it is clear that, your working setup has:
> 
> # CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE is not set
> # CONFIG_X86_PCC_CPUFREQ is not set
> CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
> 
> and rc4 version has:
> 
> CONFIG_X86_INTEL_PSTATE=y
> CONFIG_X86_PCC_CPUFREQ=m
> CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ=m
> 
> So, i believe you are using another cpufreq driver this, try with same
> configuration once.
> 
> > 1. Kernel 3.8.0:
> >
> > Output (show only fisrt CPU, others are same):
> > cpu0/cpufreq//affected_cpus:0
> > cpu0/cpufreq//related_cpus:0 1 2 3
> 
> > Kernel 3.9.0-rc1
> 
> > CASE 2
> > After boot:
> > cpu0/cpufreq//affected_cpus:0 1 2 3
> > cpu0/cpufreq//related_cpus:0 1 2 3
> 
> My attached patch will restore 1. instead of CASE 2.
> 
> > ===============================================================================
> > Kernel 3.9.0-rc4
> >
> > CASE 7
> > (normal boot)
> > cpu0/cpufreq//affected_cpus:0
> > cpu0/cpufreq//related_cpus:0
> 
> This must be related to your different driver.

Yes, intel_pstate is not really a cpufreq driver.  It just overtakes the
whole subsystem.

Dirk, can you please check if this is as intended?

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/