linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130324211336.GA18316@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:13:37 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	rob@...dley.net, mturquette@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	cooloney@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, wim@...ana.be, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	gg@...mlogic.co.uk, j-keerthy@...com, ldewangan@...dia.com,
	t-kristo@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/12] Palmas updates

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 06:04:55AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:55:10 +0000 Ian Lartey <ian@...mlogic.co.uk> wrote:

> > Patches based on linux-next-20130319

> I can't really comment on the patch set except to say that you should not
> base on linux-next, you should base on the tree to which you expect the
> patch set to be applied.

It's fairly common to suggest to people working over lots of subsystems
like this that they use -next since for most subsystems it contains the
trees that should be submitted against and it's much more efficient.
This works OK most of the time when people are posting patches as
opposed to pull requests, though obviously cross tree issues do happen
from time to time.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)