[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130325152258.b930b51cccd98bedceeca92c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:22:58 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
fs/proc/inode.c between commit ("vfs,proc: guarantee unique inodes
in /proc") from Linus' tree and commit
"procfs-improve-scaling-in-proc-v5" from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/proc/inode.c
index 38f0775,f53660a..0000000
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@@ -463,10 -464,10 +464,11 @@@ static const struct file_operations pro
struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct proc_dir_entry *de)
{
- struct inode *inode = iget_locked(sb, de->low_ino);
+ struct inode *inode = new_inode_pseudo(sb);
+ const struct file_operations *fops;
- if (inode && (inode->i_state & I_NEW)) {
+ if (inode) {
+ inode->i_ino = de->low_ino;
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
PROC_I(inode)->pde = de;
@@@ -491,9 -494,11 +495,10 @@@
#endif
inode->i_fop = &proc_reg_file_ops;
} else {
- inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops;
+ inode->i_fop = fops;
}
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- unlock_new_inode(inode);
} else
pde_put(de);
return inode;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists